Saturday, July 15, 2006

Religion: A Renunciation of Reason?


We are living in an increasingly intolerant world. Actions beget instant and inimical reactions. We cry "hurt" too easily and then eagerly seek to excoriate our apparent enemies. Humanity and Principles be damned! And much of it is in the name of religion!

Haven't we been giving just too much importance to religion? Why have we allowed the religious identity of a person (a circumstance that he had no control over in the first place) decide whether and which opportunities are available to him in life....or at a more basic level....his right to life itself?

Every religion is a Philosophy. A way of understanding and explaining Life and its mystiques. The founder of each religion was indeed a man of exceptional genius and great insight...and a great philosopher and writer too! Someone who could lucidly explain his theories to the masses, in a way that they would understand. And since they did, they venerated that man. These great men deserve all our earnest eulogies. For they could make philosophies that have withstood the test of centuries! It is an ENORMOUS accomplishment indeed to impress the infinite number of people who have read their books since they were written and were convinced enough by their theories and beliefs to adopt them!

Each new religion arose when its founder, being the intelligent man that he was, found cracks within the theories that the religion that he was born into expounded. His dissatisfaction with the existing explanations led him to his own theories and that was how a new line of thought streamed out of the established religion.

Thus each religion has its foundations in Critical Reasoning.
And yet ironically, we know Religion to inspire Blind Faith....a renunciation of all reason, among the multitudes.

The problem starts when we stop analyzing and start believing mechanically in all the priests and the prophets say. Such a meek submission is extolled as Faith and is made into a virtue. And any attempt at reason or questioning is snubbed, not only by the clergy but the society at large, as heretical and iconoclastic.

And this is where Religion starts becoming "an opium of the masses."
The word 'masses' itself is a derogatory reference to a cattle-like herd of people who can be shepherded in any direction, because they won't exercise their own mind and intelligence.

Intellect is the origin of each religion. And so, by corollary, intellect is Above each religion.

Each individual should be taught to respect and exercise his intellect, for indeed, we all have it. And, if one finds certain deficiencies in the philosophy he reads in his religious books, he should be free to reinterpret them and reform them in a way that seems logical to him. He should be given the freedom to question, analyze and theorize upon his religion, or indeed any religion. Equally important is his right to discuss and debate his interpretations with the society at large.

So, Religion should be open to frank and incisive Group Discussions.

People plead "hurt religious sensitivities" as a result of such discussions and debates. They stage processions, protests or worse even carnage to register their "anger". But can we allow such orchestrated conduct to intimidate the freedom of speech and discussion? Indeed this freedom is the very breath of the civilization.

Such a freedom is vital to the spirit of religion as well. Religion enlightens so long as it remains a stream of fluid ideas, indeed so long as it remains personal....YOUR religion should mean the way YOU interpret the thoughts and the theories of the basic religion. You may agree with some, disagree with others, or even propound some platitudes and philosophies of your own!

When this freedom is curbed, when all Reason and Debate is denounced, what we get is the Founder's religion....Nanak's Sikhism, The Prophet's Islam, the Vedas' Hinduism. We are told to take ALL of the philosophy without being given any alternative (not that many would seek it though). Thus religion becomes an impersonal, imposing monolith. It becomes a shackle, rather than a stream. And we become the slaves of our religious identity....our minds led by our religion, when it should have been the other way round!

And, whenever any actual or perceived attack is made on the Founder's philosophy, we are fervently told that the religion is under threat! And amazingly, people do go to all extents to 'protect' their religion.

All of us are aware of far too many instances of this phenomenon. And the more we tolerate such misplaced zealotry, the more we fan it, and the more we confound the problem.

Indeed, Religion is best left alone.....to each one, his own.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

hmmm now that is too japi .. in the first place .. analyzing each and every angle to the depth .. and you deserve a pat on the back for that ...

really.. every idea that a person gets ... there is an underlying reason for that .. and above all a perspective on which the flow thought is based .. ok in what you have written it is following one basic line of thought but at places you have managed to bring up other ideas and ideologies too and that is really nice..

i like the follow of thought and way it all links up to each other, the style of writing is cool and it also reflects the true philosophical you, I have been impressed many times at ur knowledge of the punjabi philosphers and history and all ... and here all that reflects. You know what you are writing and it has the solid backing of a well informed mind. Its not just a random flow of ideas, that you can probably associate with me .. :P

in all a really nicely done blog, shows that you have given it a nice solid thought and also you make others think with that and that is an even bigger achievement ... you have handled a delicate topic really well .. and thats impressive .. good job !

keep the good work up ... :)

Anonymous said...

very beautifully written essay..it has maturity..it has subtlety..it has insight...

to say that all religions are based upon reason...hmm thats a tough one....some would say religions are a residue of a medevial mind....some would say it was the result of piercing minds who studied the human condition to its very depth and concluded deities needed to be created to make life bearable....some would say that these minds truly perceived a Creator....some would say that was a historical randomness and power struggles that brought certain religious philosophies to the fore and made them mass movements rather than inherent merit. each argument seems equally plausible.

as i heard a very insightful sanskrit professor say in the big fight on ndtv....underlying power discourses are inherent in religious philosophies (or religious texts) (for example the sidelining of women) and they will inevitably lead to strife..

if everyone looked at religion as you would like to see it....fluid and personal....things would be a lot better